Haultain Research

Haultain Research

Share this post

Haultain Research
Haultain Research
A Canadian energy strategy is wrong for Alberta

A Canadian energy strategy is wrong for Alberta

MNG
Feb 13, 2012
∙ Paid

Share this post

Haultain Research
Haultain Research
A Canadian energy strategy is wrong for Alberta
Share

Alberta need not tie itself to a so-called Canadian energy strategy to promote provincial objectives.

While joking about getting nervous when he hears the words "national" and "energy" in the same sentence, Prime Minister Stephen Harper exposed the absence of clarity as to what, whether called "national" or "Canadian," a grand energy plan for the country would really mean. And what would it mean for Albertans?

The first Alison Redford government throne speech provides some definition. While a throne speech is no beacon for clarity, there were three discernible principles in Redford's pan-Canadian strategy: diversification of clientele, explanation of our goals and facilitation in bringing goods to market.

Client diversification refers to finding and securing greater markets. Since the current U.S. administration has chosen to be intimidated by environmentalists and ignore its vital strategic security, Alberta cannot afford to rely on steadily supplying that market. Designing "initiatives…

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Haultain Research to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 MNG@Haultain
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share